Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Why I hate the party system




Last May I wrote: I hate the party system. I still do. This came up today in a chat with another homeschool mom, so I thought I'd recap.

In all fairness, this isn't just about the party system. As humans, we migrate to those most like us. It is one of the ways we find normalcy and comfort. Yet, then there are those who play upon that and use it to their advantage in building their "side." Most people are easily drawn into this without even knowing it's happening.

I speak from experience. I battle it every single day. We all look for connection ... our tribe ... our peeps. It isn't just Republicans and Democrats. It is one football team against another. It is those who live in the country against those who live in town. It is the Drama Department against the Athletic Department. It is one side of the street against the other. It is the boys against the girls.

Here is what I hate about divisiveness, and what I see in our party system. Here is why I want to say, "I hate the party system":

It functions best (in our favor) when we despise the other side. Period.

When we are working to choose a candidate for our party's ticket, each person is meticulously severed and destroyed. The best way to get people to vote for your person is to make sure they absolutely loathe the other person. It's fact. Just talking about strengths is not enough to win an election. We must destroy the other person.

Then, by the time a presidential election rolls around, we have to work night-and-day to change the reactions of those who now dry heave at the mention of the name on the party's ticket. We can't undo and erase our saturation of slander, so we use the same process to go after the person running for the other party. It is ugly. It is destructive. Many times it is outright false. It leaves us completely and utterly divided. This, then, trickles down to our decision making, our relationships and our public and private conversations. We have no more common ground.

I came home to re-watch a talk by Kathryn Shulz. She hurt me deeply with some of the things she said - because she shone a massive spotlight on how my natural instincts can be ... wrong ... hurtful. She talks about our belief that we are right, and how we then try to explain why others disagree with us. Shulz exposes (SPOTLIGHT) how most of us use a "series of unfortunate assumptions" to do this:

1. The Ignorance Assumption. We assume they don't have access to the same information we do, but if they did, SURELY we would agree. When we then discover that, in fact, they DO have the same information, we move to the second assumption.

2. The Idiocy Assumption. We have to think that they have all the information they need, but must be too stupid to figure out what is right. Yet, sometimes this involves people we know and we can't ignore the fact that we believe some of these people actually have a reasonable degree of intelligence. So, we then move along to a third assumption to solidify our rightness.

3. The Evil Assumption. "They know the truth, and they are deliberately distorting it for their own malevolent purposes."


I don't know the solution. I don't actually believe there is one. We will always be human. I guess I am hoping, wishing, yearning that more of us would work harder to fight against these natural tendencies. I'm willing to keep trying. I believe that would make a dent. I really do.


"This is a catastrophe. This attachment to our own rightness keeps us from preventing mistakes when we absolutely need to, and causes us to treat each other terribly." - Kathryn Shulz





(photo by B S K, used with permission)

4 comments:

Blessed said...

Oh, Amen, sister!

I have a feeling the political spectrum represented by your readers is veeeeeeeeeeery broad. and yet here we all are, happily reading and commenting. How the mood would change if we started mentioning our political (or even religious) affiliations! So sad, but so true.

I am glad you wrote this--can we all agree to NOT do this in 2012 as best as possible? And can we all do our best to promote healthier ways of dialoging (and voting!) this election year?

Christine, you got a whole bunch of strangers happily sharing their sex lives for the betterment of all--what can you do for our political lives this year? ; ) If it is as healthy and positive and inclusive, I am in!

Erin said...

I totally agree with you.

Indigo Lewis said...

I remember this post from last year, right as a local evangelical vaccinator was going into her us vs. them stance. It was a powerful way to frame the discomfort I was having with her promotion of the issue.

Thanks for re-posting.

susieloulou said...

Good point. I have so many people trying to save me from my ignorance, then dismiss me as an idiot (and perhaps evil, but I never find out).
:-D